Sunday, August 1, 2010
Summary Final
In "Is Google Making Us Stupid?: What the Internet is doing to our brains," Nicholas Carr illustrates how technology may be reshaping how we as a society are learning, collecting and interpreting information. He compares our modern day internet with the artificial inelegance from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, able to retrieve vast quantities of information with a single request, but at what cost. Carr tells us that the books that once caused him to imagine and think no longer drew the appeal they once did. What Carr feels has changed his way of thinking is none other then the internet. As a writer, he uses the internet to conduct much of his research in what Carr terms a “godsend”. He describes his reading “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.” Concerned with inability to stay focused on his reading he confers with his colleges only to find that they to have been struggling with the same thoughts. Carr refers to “study of online research habits” a 5 year study conducted by University College London, which “suggests that we may well be in the midst of a sea change in the way we read and think.” This fact seems to comfort Carr. We are still reading just in a different way. Thanks to the internet and the use of text messaging, long gone is the need for big bulky typewriters and books, replaced by small cell phones and a huge library of information at your fingertips on Google. He tells us how, like Frederick Winslow Taylor in the industrial world, our thinking and processing of our writing seems to be becoming almost mechanical. However, our quests for advancement moves us forward much like the team at Google who is striving to create real artificial inelegance. Carr is concerned, is this technology, this desire to create artificial intelligence causing us to lose our intelligence.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Steven--
ReplyDeletePretty good job here! Accurate for the most part. I do feel that it's a little "top-heavy," concentrating more on the beginning of the article than the middle-to-end. He starts by talking about his experience reading (which is most of what you cover here), but expands to wondering if the Internet has changed not just content but process of thinking itself. He also spends quite a bit of time taling about other technological advances (development of writing, printing press, typewriter) and their effects.
For the amount of space you've taken, this is fairly thorough, but it's a little on the short side (if you gave yourself a little more room, you could get into more of the complexities of his argument).
In terms of organization, this feels a little scattered. I think it would help if you could identify three or four (or so) main ideas and break this into smaller paragraphs. (That part is quite a challenge for this article, I think: maybe his own experience of reading, then the historical view of how technology has changed thinking, then reasons why the Internet increases distraction, then something about Google to tie to title??)